privatization roundtable report

We started our Privatization Study with an overview and discussion with current examples and proposals in the news. You can read the briefing with video links at www.lwvddh.org/privatization.pdf. Some personal experiences were shared along with well-studied ideas and strong opinions. Our president talked about her time as a school board member when the custodial staff counter-offered to keep their jobs instead of losing them to outsourcing. Our treasurer shared her expertise regarding the Social Security program as we considered how it differs from investments.

An important point that came out of our discussion is that the issue to privatize or not seems to get tangled up in corruption issues. While we agreed that corruption in the private and public sectors ought to be addressed directly, sometimes it seems too far gone to do anything but start over.

The need for strong oversight to ensure proper delivery of services or transfer of assets would ease concerns for some. In certain situations, the potential for harm if things went wrong was considered too risky. For example, with the police and military, a closer tie between them and the citizenry would hopefully mean loyalty to the public over their employer.

We will continue the discussion with ideas from many sources, pros and cons. If you find an interesting article, please pass it along.

Here is an article that warns against privatization from one of our roundtable attendees:

http://www.alternet.org/story/153093/privatization_nightmare:_5_public_services_that_should_never_be_handed_over_to_greedy_corporations

What does your water taste like?

How would you describe the water from your tap? Metallic, fresh, tasteless, chlorinated, bland, clean...? 80% of water taste testers preferred the taste of our bottled water samples at UM Dearborn's Water Expo. We hosted a blind taste test as part of their Sustainability Week. Along with bottled natural spring water, we had a sample from the bottle refill station at a local grocery store and the campus tap water. Last year we had a similar event where the preference was about tied, so we were surprised at the overwhelming preference for bottled water this time around. Sometimes tap water wins, sometimes it doesn't. If you don't like the taste of your tap, do you filter it, put up with it, or pay for another source?

At what cost?

With our cultural emphasis on hydration and effective marketing, many have just gotten in the bottled water habit. See this 20/20 episode on the impact of marketing - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_3QBZac3MSY - which also mentions that some bottled water is just tap water conveniently packaged.

If you watched the movie "F.L.O.W.", you might recall the dispute between commercial access to cheap water, the transfer of water out of a local watershed and the differing regulatory oversight of municipal vs bottled water. Here's a trailer: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LGd9D4J0lag.

Objections about bottled water also include the production and disposal of the plastic bottle itself, the environmental burden caused by trucking water across the country, and the comparatively high price per gallon.

Visit this website to learn about the energy-intensive production of bottled water and other important factors: http://www.responsiblepurchasing.org/purchasing_guides/bottled_water_university_edition/social_environ/

To avoid the plastic problem, the convenience of bottled water can be met by refillable containers. UM Dearborn has a bottle-filling adaptation on the drinking fountain at the University Center, so students can refill any container with chilled tap water. It does taste better cold. The UMD Student Environmental Association is working to get rid of all plastic bottles on campus with an emphasis on sustainability, but refillable containers help budgets as well. The current decline in bottle water sales are most likely related to the economic downturn. http://moneyland.time.com/2010/02/01/bottled-water-taste-test-challenge/

Tap Water vs Frack Water

This particular taste test included 'natural spring water' from a region threatened by fracking. What will be the results if fracking fluids impact the source? With complaints about water quality coming out of these regions, it may be even more important to know where our drinking water has been and what has been done to it. Start your studies by reading here: http://www.americanrivers.org/our-work/protecting-rivers/fracking/?gclid=CPGH-Lyw8KsCFYlM4AodWBRpIg

SMART changes? Transportation Cuts Ahead

Due to the significant decrease in revenue and increased fuel and healthcare costs, SMART is seeking public input on proposed service changes. SMART encourages its riders and any citizen to attend the public hearings to better understand the issues at hand. Citizens will have the opportunity to contribute their comments. The public hearings are scheduled for: November 3rd, 4:00 P.M. to 7:00 P.M. City of Dearborn Ford Community & Performing Arts Center 15801 Michigan Avenue, Club Room #1 Dearborn, MI November 7th, 4:00 P.M. to 7:00 P.M. City of Pleasant Ridge Community Center 4 Ridge Road Pleasant Ridge, MI November 9th, 4:00 P.M. to 7:00 P.M. City of Roseville Council Chambers 29777 Gratiot Avenue Roseville, MI For those who are unable to attend the hearings, written comments will be accepted through November 10, 2011. Send written comments to: SMART Administrative Offices 535 Griswold Street, Suite 600 Detroit, MI 48226 Attention: Public Hearings Send email comments to: publichearing@smartbus.org To review proposed service cuts click here. For more details, please visit SMART's website at www.smartbus.org. For further questions, please call Customer Information (866) 962-5515.

Forum Showtimes (updated)

Candidate Forums and Millage Proposals were taped in Dearborn Hts and Dearborn.

note: This article will be updated as additional viewing times are scheduled.

Bookmark this link if you want to check times as we will be updating the viewing schedule as needed. http://lwvddh.blogspot.com/2011/10/forum-video-showtimes.html

Dearborn Hts Forums

> City Council Forum - 1 & 7 am/pm Daily

> Headlee Override Forum - 2:30 & 8:30 am/pm Daily

> D7 School Board Forum - 12:30 am/pm on Saturdays & Sundays

> The City Clerk Forum - 6 & 12 am/pm Daily

Dearborn Forums

Millage and Civil Service Commission Proposals, Dearborn School Board

>>Dearborn Ballot Proposals online forum video. Click to watch.

>>Dearborn School Board Forum is available online. Click to watch!

Times listed below are for CDTV WOW channel 10, Comcast channel 12

Millage and Civil Service Ballot Proposals

Mon. 6 & 10 am, 2, 6, 10 pm

Tue. 7 & 11 am, 3 & 11 pm

Wed. 6 & 10 am, 6 & 10 pm

Thu. 7 & 11 am, 3 & 11 pm

Fri. 6 am, 2, 6, 10 pm

Sat. 8 am, 12 & 4 pm

Sun. 8 am, 12 pm

Dearborn School Board Forum

Mon. 11 am, 3 pm

Tue. 12 & 4 pm

Wed. 11 am, 7 pm

Thu. 8 am, 4 pm

Fri. 6 am, 2, 6, 10 pm

Sat. 9 am, 9 pm

Sun. 8 am, 12 pm

Comcast Customers Only - Additional viewing times on Public Service Channel 18
October 15 and 16 at 9am, 12pm, 3pm, 6pm

Nov 5 and 6 at 8am, 12:30pm, 5pm NEW TIMES

Privatization Study - Nov 17th

If you are interested in forming an educated opinion about this issue, you will find that it is not a simple topic. The shades of gray become apparent when ones studies the history of government and business collaborations. From the company town to corrupted townships, there are extreme cases on either side.

The Seattle LWV has done extensive research in preparation for a national study. Their published report is a great place to start. The last pages of this lengthy publication includes a list of references.

http://www.seattlelwv.org/sites/default/files/privatization2009.pdf

You are invited to add links and suggested reading to this post or on our facebook page, http://www.facebook.com/lwvddh.org. You can also email comments, links and references to lwvddh@gmail.com.

Additional links will be added here, so please check back.

November 17th, Thurs @ 7pm.

Christ Episcopal Church, 120 N. Military at Cherry Hill.

Dearborn Forum this Tuesday, Oct 4.

Attend our next forum in Dearborn's Council Chambers this week. Tuesday evening, October 4th, we will have a school board candidates forum at 7pm and presentations about the 3 millage proposals at 8pm.

Dearborn School Board – Elect 2 of 4

Stephen Stanley Dobkowski Jr.

Joseph A. Guido

Roxanne McDonald

Mary K. Petlichkoff

Proposal 1 OPERATING MILLAGE:

The City of Dearborn has cut 35% of its non-Police and Fire workforce and reduced spending by $12 million annually. Lower tax revenues will require more reductions and impact services and programs further. An additional 5-year millage will allow Dearborn to maintain core services while permanently reducing operating costs.

Shall Section 13.2 of the Dearborn City Charter be amended to temporarily allow the City to levy an additional ad valorem tax up to $3.50 per $1,000 in taxable value (3.5 mills) which will raise approximately $12,250,000 in the first year it is levied, for no more than 5 years?

YES or NO

Proposal 2 LIBRARY MILLAGE:

State law allows citizens to authorize that 1 mill be dedicated to offset the costs of providing library services. Due to declining revenues, library services have been reduced. Additional revenues will be used to support greater technology so that the City of Dearborn can provide effective and efficient access to informational, developmental, and entertainment-oriented materials in order to meet current and future user demands.

Shall the City of Dearborn in accordance with State law MCL § 397.201 levy an additional ad valorem tax in an amount not to exceed $1 per $1,000 in taxable value which equals 1 mill or approximately $3,500,000 in the first year it is levied for no more than 10 years dedicated to fund the ongoing operational and capital costs of a library system?

YES or NO

Proposal 3 ELIMINATION OF THE CIVIL SERVICE SYSTEM:

The Civil Service System as defined in Chapter 11 of the Dearborn City Charter was created before City employees formed 8 different labor unions to represent them in negotiating contracts covering wages, benefits, and work rules. The provisions in these contracts take precedence over Civil Service policies. Dearborn is one of a few Michigan cities that still has a Civil Service System. If necessary, the City Council could create a Human Resources Commission by ordinance to oversee any employment issues for City employees.

Shall the Dearborn City Charter be amended to eliminate the Civil Service System by repealing Chapter 11?

YES or NO

Dearborn Heights Candidate Forum Sept. 28

On Wednesday, September 28, candidates for the Dearborn Heights City Clerk, City Council, and the District 7 School Board will participate in a forum hosted by the League of Women Voters of Dearborn – Dearborn Heights.

The evening will begin with an explanation of the one ballot proposal on the November 8 General Election in Dearborn Heights, the Headlee Override Millage Proposal. Speaking will be Eric Lupher, Director of Local Affairs for the Citizens Research Council of Michigan, who will give a broad overview of what the Headlee Amendment is and what an override means, and Daniel Paletko, Mayor of Dearborn Heights. This portion will be held from 6:30 p.m. to 7:00 p.m.

At 7 p.m. the candidates for City Clerk, Janet S. Badalow and Walter J.Prusiewicz, will participate in a 30-minute forum. There will be an opportunity for written questions from the audience, asked by the moderator, Jenni Dunn, a member of the League.

The City Council candidate forum will be held immediately following, at approximately 7:30 p.m. There are 5 people running for 3 openings. It is scheduled to last 1-hour and there will be an opportunity for written questions from the audience, asked by the moderator.

At approximately 8:30 p.m. the candidates for the District 7 School Board will participate in a forum scheduled to last for one hour. There are 4 candidates running for 2 positions on the school board.

The forum will be held in the City Council Chambers at the Dearborn Heights City Hall, 6045 Fenton. The public is invited to attend.

In addition to the moderator, Jenni Dunn, the president of the League of Women Voters, Mary Bugeia will welcome the speakers, candidates, and members of the audience. The evening will be videotaped by WDHT for rebroadcast on local access government cable television channels on WOW, Comcast and AT&T.

Betsy Cushman chairs the Voters Service Committee. Members include Chris Sullivan, Dennis Kirchoff, Joe Borrajo, Judy Carty, Judy Patrick, Mary Bugeia, Carolyn Buell, Barb Adams, Jenni Dunn and Kathy Gapa.

Bullets and Ballots - Remember Sept 11th

On the morning of September 11, 2001, I was home with 3 children as we watched the videos from New York and worried about what’s next. The screen presents fiction more often than facts, so it took awhile to understand the reality of this attack. Meanwhile many had to leave the TV and take care of the day’s work. On that day, election workers were handling Dearborn’s Mayoral Primary. Sometime later I was in the voting booth when my husband called with alarm. He had heard a radio report about rioting in Dearborn and worried about our safety.

The fear from that day has echoed through the years with a patriotic fervor and a decade of war, but I wonder why the pledges of patriotism haven’t produced civic engagement. Voter turnout is embarrassingly low for a nation so proud of its legacy. At great risk others demand a voice in dictatorial nations, while we dismiss our own democratic process.

Proponents of 2nd amendment rights tout the value of a well-armed citizenry to protect against tyranny, but I’d like to call on a well-informed citizenry to practice democracy. Sergeant Molly carried the water and loaded the cannon because she had no other recourse for liberty. Now she has the right to vote so that her first line of defense is the ballot box. Hold the line with this basic right and restore voter turnout as a patriotic duty.

LWV began 90 years ago to arm new voters with information about candidates and issues. Our heritage continues with a busy Voter Service Committee, a League hallmark in our own community for 60 years. Candidates and voters are urged to participate fully in the campaign process and on election day. One vote can sometimes make a difference, but when the majority of potential voters sit it out, do you wonder that a motivated minority gets more of a say? From one election to the next, we have basically told candidates to “call someone who cares”, so they do. What will our city and nation be like 10 years from today if we amped up our fervor for making democracy work at home? Let’s find out.

By Jenni Dunn

Does city government matter to you?

The turnout for the recent primary election in Dearborn Heights should be cause for concern to every person in the city. With 37,000 registered voters, only 3,510 voted on August 2nd. Primary elections are the first and most important step in the election process. It is the first opportunity to make your opinion count. If you don’t vote in the primary then you may lose your chance to vote for your choice in the general election.

The League of Women Voters has always believed in the importance of primary elections and that is why, in the recent election, the Dearborn – Dearborn Heights League of Women Voters spent time and money to put on a candidate forum and to publish a Voter Guide. We would like to thank all the candidates for their participation and for their active involvement in this democratic process.

We also would like to remind all registered voters that democracy is not a spectator sport.

You cannot sit on the sidelines and expect your voice to be heard.

Local government is the where our democracy begins. Many people today complain that government doesn’t listen to them. But local government is where it starts. This is where your voice can most readily be heard. The office of City Clerk oversees elections and protects our rights in the voting process. If you didn’t vote in this election ask yourself why. What is more important than protecting our rights as citizens.

Throughout the world today we see people dying for the rights that we take for granted.

The League of Women Voters, as a non-partisan organization, asks Dearborn Heights citizens, as well as area citizens, to participate with us in finding ways to increase voter interest and participation. As a community, together, we can learn from this poor turnout and become engaged citizens.


Mary Bugeia, President, League of Women Voters Dearborn – Dearborn Heights

Study Up, Stand Up, Stop Fracking.

We all have so much to do that we have to prioritize, and I am asking you to put fracking issues on the front burner this year. This has already gone too far across the states, and it will destroy our greatest treasure without even a speed bump along the way. I'd like to do more than slow them down while getting run over, but we can only make it stop if we work together.

Do you think ANY nationwide industrial procedure should be exempt from environmental regulations? Should ANY industry that uses tons of water and chemicals be set free to do as it sees fit throughout our state?

Some people do prefer less regulation, very few desire NO regulation. When Michigan residents learn about fracking, I expect we will have a consensus to put the brakes on this unhindered pollution threat.

As you consider the consequences to our state when crops, livestock and wildlife are damaged and community water supplies are destroyed, you might also want to consider how profiteers will benefit even more. If you know something about the global privatization and profit potential of water, then you know why pollution doesn't matter to corporate interests. Pollution just opens up another profitable market - selling drinkable water to you will be a great deal for them. If you want a silver-lining, maybe you can dream about getting a job driving water trucks from town to town.

Get started here:

http://www.pbs.org/now/shows/613/index.html

http://www.thisamericanlife.org/radio-archives/episode/440/game-changer

The program "This American Life" also highlights the total disregard this industry has for local government. Can your elected officials withstand the propaganda and harrassment? Can you?

Jenni

Listen to This American Life on Fracking

Clean Air in Jeopardy by Kathy Gapa

Even though the LWVUS started supporting all laws

concerning the environment in the 1920’s-the Clean

Air Act, the Clean Water Act. Through the years

assaults have occurred to undermine these laws.

In April 2011, an assault was attempted to gut the

Environmental Protection Agency, including the Clean Air Act.
Local and state Leagues and the national LWV honored Earth Day

(April 22) as a day of action, engaging our communities
to help safeguard the EnvironmentalProtection Agency’s

ability to establish the urgently needed protections

called for by the Clean Air Act.

In a recent statement, League President Elizabeth

MacNamara strongly voiced the League’s concern

about protecting Clean Air. Earlier, the League and

coalition partners had sent a letter to members of

the House of Representatives urging them to oppose

H.R. 910, which would put America’s health,

prosperity, and national security at risk!

Also, the League, with the American Lung

Association and the Sierra Club, has been

conducting a series of phone briefings that target

women in seven states about the health risks

inherent in stripping the EPA of its authority over

clean air. The first “Talking about Toxics Program”

was held in Ohio on April 14 with a second on

April 20 in Michigan. Future briefings will be

conducted in Pennsylvania, Minnesota, Missouri,

Colorado, and Massachusetts.

Clean Air Act: A New Approach to Regulating Greenhouse Gas Emissions

With the demise of cap-and-trade legislation during the 2010 session of Congress, the climate action spotlight has shifted to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Clean Air Act (CAA). But efforts are now underway to block EPA regulation of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions.

Clean Air Act of 1970

In the aftermath of the first Earth Day in April 1970, Congress passed the Clean Air Act and created the EPA to implement the new law. Over the 40 years that the CAA has been in effect, it has yielded dramatic public health and environmental benefits.

CAA programs have achieved major reductions in dangerous air pollutants that cause smog, acid rain, and lead poisoning. The EPA reports that this has prevented hundreds of thousands of premature deaths, has helped millions avoid developing respiratory ailments and heart disease, and (by banning leaded gasoline) has greatly reduced the incidence of low child IQ.

The benefits of these advances have far exceeded the costs of compliance. An EPA analysis of the CAA's first 20 years found that the dollar value of the human health and environmental benefits amounted to more than 40 times the costs of regulation. For the 1990-2010 period, as requirements have become more stringent, the EPA estimates a benefit-to-cost ratio of four to one.

At the same time, CAA programs spurred significant growth in the U.S. environmental technologies industry. By 2007, the industry was generating $282 billion in revenues, producing $40 billion in exports, and supporting 1.6 million jobs. Innovations include catalytic converters, scrubbers, and low-VOC paints and consumer products.

U.S. Supreme Court Ruling

Despite these achievements, concerns about global warming pollution led Massachusetts and 11 other states to sue the EPA over its failure to regulate GHG emissions from the transportation sector. They charged that human-influenced global climate change was causing adverse effects, such as sea-level rise, to the state of Massachusetts.

In a 5-4 decision in April 2007, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that carbon dioxide and other GHGs meet the definition of "air pollutants" under the CAA. The Court directed the EPA to determine whether or not GHG emissions from new motor vehicles (the sector cited in the lawsuit) cause or contribute to air pollution that may endanger the public health or welfare.

In 2009, the EPA responded by conducting an extensive examination of the scientific evidence and, in December 2009, made a determination — the "endangerment finding" — that GHG concentrations in the atmosphere do threaten the public health and welfare of current and future generations. The EPA also found that GHG emissions from new motor vehicles contribute to the atmospheric concentration of these gases and, thus, to the threat from climate change.

Once the EPA had issued its endangerment finding, the agency moved ahead to finalize proposed GHG emissions standards for light-duty motor vehicles.

The Clean Cars Rule

The EPA partnered with the Department of Transportation (DOT) to set increasingly stringent standards for GHG emissions and fuel efficiency for passenger cars and light-duty trucks for model years 2012-2016.

The federal rules mirror California's Clean Car Standards, also adopted by 13 other states, and set a target of 35.5 miles per gallon (mpg) for 2016 model-year vehicles. The auto industry welcomed the uniform national standards.

The new standards surpass the 2007 federal fuel economy law, which required an average fuel economy of 35 mpg in 2020. The EPA estimates that the new rules will cut GHG emissions by 960 million metric tons over the regulated vehicles' lifetime, equivalent to taking 50 million cars and light trucks off the road in 2030. Consumers can expect to save $3,000 over the lifetime of a model-year 2016 vehicle.

The EPA and DOT have since proposed emissions and fuel efficiency standards for heavy-duty trucks and buses, beginning in the 2014 model year, and will also set further standards for light-duty vehicles for model years 2017 and beyond.

Stationary Source Regulations

The EPA is also phasing in regulations for major stationary sources of GHG emissions (e.g., power plants, industrial facilities). As of January 2, 2011, rules requiring new or substantially modified facilities to obtain permits that address their GHG emissions have begun to take effect. These facilities must make use of "best available control technologies" to minimize GHG emissions.

The EPA has taken steps to ensure that the new rules do not affect small stationary sources, such as small businesses and farms, schools, or churches. CAA permitting requirements apply to facilities that emit more than 100-250 tons/year of a regulated pollutant such as lead, sulfur dioxide, and nitrogen dioxide. But GHGs are emitted in much higher volumes than these pollutants.

The EPA, therefore, issued a "tailoring rule" that raises the threshold for GHG emissions so that only the largest sources would be subject to the permitting requirements. The thresholds for GHG emissions are 75,000-100,000 tons/year.

In addition, the EPA has established a timeline for setting limits on GHG emissions for both new and existing power plants and oil refineries. The EPA will propose new rules for power plants in July 2011 and for refineries in December 2011. Final rules for power plants will be issued in May 2012 and for refineries in November 2012. Together, power plants and refineries account for about 40 percent of all U.S. GHG emissions

Challenges to EPA Regulations

Opponents of the new rules are working to block or delay EPA regulation of GHG emissions. Several dozen legal challenges to EPA's recent actions have been filed by a variety of business and industry groups and by several states and members of Congress.

In Congress, bills have been introduced that would, for example, amend the CAA to exclude regulation of GHGs, limit the use of EPA funds, and delay regulation of GHG emissions for two years.

The League of Women Voters strongly opposes efforts such as these to undermine the EPA's ability to establish the urgently needed clean air protections called for by the CAA. It's time for action -- time to reduce dangerous global warming pollution and safeguard "the public health and welfare of current and future generations."

By Eleanor Revelle (LWVIL and LWVUS Climate Change Task Force Member)

For more details, see the Clean Air Defense section of the LWVUS Toolkit for Climate Action (www.lwv.org/climatechangetoolkit).

Produced by the LWVUS Climate Change Task Force

© 2011 by the League of Women Voters of the United States

"Environmental Crisis on your Plate" Cont'd

We had a very informative meeting with the Dearborn Sustainability Roundtable on Feb 15th. Thank you to everyone who came to the program. We had a potluck too, with soup, bread, appetizers, fruit, salad and dessert - YUM! Everything was excellent and we had a lot of people attending.

Kathleen Gapa and Mary Bugeia started the meeting with a brief overview of the League of Women Voters. The League's record for environmental causes showed the significant progress that has been made in the last century by grassroots advocacy, and yet there continues to be a battle to protect our natural resources and public health. What a strange era we are in now as hard-won environmental protections are under attack. We need to move forward on new fronts as we've learned in these round tables, yet we find ourselves also holding the line for protections that should be a given. For example, clean air is not an optional preference, it is a necessity. We should be able to focus solely on healthy sustainable foods, but find that even in the 21st century clean water and air are being jeopardized by misguided policy makers.

Lynna Kaucheck, of Food and Water Watch www.fwwatch.org spoke at this event as well. Not only does Ms Kaucheck work with that organization, but she also serves on the Ferndale Environmental Sustainablity Commission. Since Dearborn is in the early stages of sustainability as a city-wide policy, we can learn a lot from Ferndale's example. If you'd like to learn more about Dearborn's activities, visit their website.

The keynote speaker for this 3-part series has been HFCC Professor Lourdes Lore, a highly credentialed and interesting speaker. We are thankful that she has shared her expertise and vast knowledge with us in the series "Environmental Crisis on your Plate." The problems with our food supply would be overwhelming if we didn't have suggested ways to tackle the issues. Katie Hetrick, reporter for the Dearborn Press & Guide, has written a great article on this particular evening, Dinner bell is call to action at roundtable.

We expect to post handouts from Professor Lore's presentations so that those who miss any of the series can still review the resources she provided. Don't miss the third and last installment, “Who Really Controls Our Food Supply?" which will be on March 23, 2011 from 6-8pm at HFCC SME building. We will reserve time for the audience to ask questions, discuss solutions, make plans and network to wrap up this winter long focus on Sustainable Food.

written by

Mary Ann Baier and Jennifer Dunn

Dearborn Cool Cities Roundtable

Members of our League recently attended a meeting

put on by the Sierra Club-Dearborn Cool Cities on

January 20 at HFCC’s SME building. The meeting

yielded many innovative and provocative ideas about

ways in which Dearborn is and can be a greener, more

environmentally friendly city.

The evening included presentations by Rick Simek, a

naturalist at the U of M Dearborn’s Environmental

Interpretive Center; Dearborn’s Sustainability

Coordinator Dave Norwood; and Margaret ”Peggy”

Matta, chair of the Detroit chapter of the Green Schools

Committee which is part of the US Green Building

Council.

Rick Simek discussed ongoing projects of the EIC, as well

as the unrecognized opportunities for exploration of

nature provided by such areas as the Henry Ford Estate,

which is located on the campus of UM-Dearborn.

The Environmental Interpretive Center is doing a lot of

programs. “We think of it as an outdoor classroom-a

living laboratory", Simek said, explaining that “although

environmental programming has been happening for

forty years, its community charm has exploded since the

EIC opened ten years ago.” February projects include

Tree Tapping Trek, Saturday, February 19 from1:00 to

3:00pm and Maple Sugaring Stroll, Saturday, March 5,

1:00 to 2:30pm.Registration is required. .If interested,

please call Rick at (313) 583-6371.

Sustainability Coordinator Dave Norwood

discussed both steps the city decided to take when a

Federal grant for sustainability work – like recycling

containers and installing LED street lights. Dave said,

“One thing I’ve learned with my job is that I do have a

plan, but if opportunities arise, I have to take advantage

of them.”For example, the city of Dearborn is working

with Friends of the Rouge on the Fordson Island cleanup

project, which eventually hopes to turn the six acre spot

into a lush natural area with native vegetation. Fordson

Island is located on a channel of the Rouge which

connects it to the Ford plants. Marathon Oil owned it

previously, but no longer needed it. Dearborn received a

NOAH grant to acquire the land. Marine Salvage Co.

removed the boats in the channel. Norwood is also

working with the Southwest Detroit Environmental

Vision which is focusing on improving air quality in

southwest Detroit and the south end of Dearborn which

are high in air particulates due to truck traffic and the

factory and steel mill are located there.

The last topic was presented by Peggy

Matta, chair of the Green Schools Committee in

Michigan, She presented ways in which schools

can go green, including adding more windows and

skylights to cut down on artificial light usage,

switching over to low-flush toilets and urinals.

Other projects include rain gardens and solar

panels which not only help schools to meet LEED

certification standards, but provide for educational

opportunities for students. LEED certification

reflects the amounts of electricity used, waste,

CO2 emissions, and water usage in a school

building.

The next program with Sierra Club-Dearborn Cool Cities,

co-hosted by LWVDDH is part 2 of a 3-part series from
HFCC Professor Lore's "Environmental Crisis on Your Plate."

The upcoming presentation on Feb. 15 is

“Chemical Components in Food & Water with

Special Focus on Pesticides, BPA’s & GMO’s ”

Part 3, “ Who Really Controls Our Food Supply?"
will be presented on March 23rd.

Also speaking on Feb 15th will be Lynna Kaucheck
of Food & Water Watch and the Ferndale Environmental

Commission. She will cover the Alfalfa GMO and

also what Ferndale is doing to become more

sustainable.

These events go from 6:00 to 8:00pm at the SME Building

on the north side of HFCC’s campus - enter the far door
on the north side of the building.