Everyone is just too busy! Instead of getting together on Saturday morning, Feb 11th, we decided to have our discussion online to prepare for the March Consensus Meeting.
The Questions that we will be discussion on March 15th can be found on this page: http://www.lwv.org/content/leaders-guide-privatization-study-consensus
Join in the conversation here or on our facebook page.
Here's a comment from a League leader in CA:
the definition of economic efficiency that i'm most familiar with is: all possible transactions are made until no one can be made better off without making someone else worse off, which is not exactly like the definitions mentioned in a good summary in wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economic_efficiency
i'm skeptical of framing the input as money. while money looks like you can measure it the same way as mass, length or time, the forces of economics such as subjective judgments of utility do not act on prices the same way that the impersonal forces of newtonian physics act on quantities of mass, length or time. in other words, money is not "cardinal" the way physics phenomena are, but rather "ordinal."
currently, fossil fuel energy is at least 200 times cheaper than human energy, at least in the
so i like to use a definition of efficiency where the output is: clean air and water, healthy food, snug shelter and plenty of sleep, and the input is: energy and resources.
submitted by: muriel strand, p.e.
privatization study team member